Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination

نویسندگان

  • Bartosz Helfer
  • Aaron Prosser
  • Myrto T Samara
  • John R Geddes
  • Andrea Cipriani
  • John M Davis
  • Dimitris Mavridis
  • Georgia Salanti
  • Stefan Leucht
چکیده

BACKGROUND As the number of systematic reviews is growing rapidly, we systematically investigate whether meta-analyses published in leading medical journals present an outline of available evidence by referring to previous meta-analyses and systematic reviews. METHODS We searched PubMed for recent meta-analyses of pharmacological treatments published in high impact factor journals. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses were identified with electronic searches of keywords and by searching reference sections. We analyzed the number of meta-analyses and systematic reviews that were cited, described and discussed in each recent meta-analysis. Moreover, we investigated publication characteristics that potentially influence the referencing practices. RESULTS We identified 52 recent meta-analyses and 242 previous meta-analyses on the same topics. Of these, 66% of identified previous meta-analyses were cited, 36% described, and only 20% discussed by recent meta-analyses. The probability of citing a previous meta-analysis was positively associated with its publication in a journal with a higher impact factor (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 2.10) and more recent publication year (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.37). Additionally, the probability of a previous study being described by the recent meta-analysis was inversely associated with the concordance of results (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.88), and the probability of being discussed was increased for previous studies that employed meta-analytic methods (odds ratio, 32.36; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 522.85). CONCLUSIONS Meta-analyses on pharmacological treatments do not consistently refer to and discuss findings of previous meta-analyses on the same topic. Such neglect can lead to research waste and be confusing for readers. Journals should make the discussion of related meta-analyses mandatory.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

پریزما؛ موارد ترجیحی در گزارش مقالات مروری منظم و فراتحلیل

Today, understanding of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and their practical use is essential for who concerned with society's health. Most of the medical reports invoked to these reviews and statements and it is necessary for scientific experts to be familiar with their performing rules and the way of their writing. The basic sciences specialists and clinical professionals study them to ...

متن کامل

Effect of pentoxifylline on anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Pentoxifylline, a valuable medication with promising clinical characteristics and considerable profile of safety is used in many conditions namely chronic kidney diseases (CKD). However, the decision to prescribe pentoxifylline for anemia in CKD should be based on evidence accrued from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Yet, substantial heterogeneity exists in studies performed to...

متن کامل

ارزیابی کیفیت گزارش مطالعات مرور نظام‌مند و فراتحلیل‌ در مجلات پرستاری و مامایی ایران

Background & Aim: In the view of the importance of evidence-based clinical practice in recent years, clinical disciplines such as nursing and midwifery have found a special need to systematic review and meta-analysis. However, systematic reviews and meta-analysises like any other studies may be poorly designed and implemented. Therefore, certain guidelines have been considered for reporting of ...

متن کامل

A PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of published dental systematic reviews in Iran, up to 2017

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proper scientific reporting is necessary to ensure correct interpretation of study results by readers. Systematic reviews (SRs) are of critical importance in evidence-based dentistry. This study assessed the reporting quality of published dental SRs in Iran.METHODS: The PubMed and ISI electronic databases were searched to collect published Iranian dental SRs up to the end of...

متن کامل

چگونه مقالات مروری منظم و فرا تحلیل‌ها را گزارش کنیم

  سخن سردبیر   Editorial   مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان   دوره دوازدهم، اردیبهشت 1392، 88-87     چگونه مقالات مروری منظم و فرا تحلیل‌ها را گزارش کنیم   How to report systematic reviews and meta-analyses     محسن رضائیان [1]   M. Rezaeian     تعداد مقالات پژوهشی اصیل که در حوزه‌های گوناگون معرفت بشری و به‌ویژه در حوزه سلامت به رشته تحریر در می‌آیند، با سرعت شتابانی افزایش می‌یابند. برای نمونه...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 13  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015